Cambridge Judge Business School Discussions on Economics & Policy

Anatole Kaletsky says we need to move away from a "monopolistic approach" to economics.

Professor Bruce Caldwell on complex economic phenomena and the history of economic ideas.

Professor Franklin Allen explains the difference between 'too big to fail' and 'too big to liquidate' and why creating a new economic world order will be problematic.

Why a new "three currencies approach" is needed to stabilise world economies, Professor Helene Rey explains.

The management of economic decline needs a better, bolder and more imaginative approach claims Professor James Galbraith.

Keynes would have supported an 'ontological' approach to economics claims economist Tony Lawson.

Professor Jeremy Siegel says markets do work and the recovery can be sustained.

Professor James Mirrlees says we should keep faith with economic modelling - it works!

Professor George Akerlof asks did bankers take their identity from the wrong cultural influences? Is the incentive structure the root cause?

Nobel Prize winner Professor Joseph Stiglitz calls for caution on the economy.

Nobel Prize winning economists give their views on what's wrong with today's economic theory, the Eurozone's future and how the USA, Britain and India and China are placed to ride out debt inflation and growth over the coming years.

Nobel Prize winning economists give their views on what's wrong with today's economic theory, the Eurozone's future and how the USA, Britain and India and China are placed to ride out debt inflation and growth over the coming years.

Michael Kitson considers the effectiveness of the economic policies of the three main parties to continue Britain's recovery. He warns of the dangers of a quick deficit cut, why the public sector needs to step in to maintain economic activity and rates the claims a coalition government will lead to an economic crisis as scare mongering. Wealthy countries, he says, do spend more on the public sector, however it is up to the electorate to vote for what they want - do they want a bigger public sector with better services or smaller with higher taxes?