Wallbuilders Live! With David Barton & Rick Green

Tired of hearing America is beyond repair? We make a grounded case for renewal—rooted in first principles, legal clarity, and a fuller telling of our national story. With Mike Berry from First Liberty, we unpack how recent Supreme Court victories have reopened space for faith and conscience in public life, including schools, and why that matters for culture as much as law. When rights are secured in the real world—teachers protected, students free to express belief, communities able to build moral formation—confidence rises and civic duty starts to make sense again.We also confront a hard question: how do you recruit young people to defend a country they’re taught to hate? The answer isn’t spin or nostalgia. It’s honest history—the good, the bad, and the ugly—paired with the founders’ radical design that places sovereignty with the people and limits government power. That framework doesn’t make us perfect, but it uniquely equips us to correct course through peaceful means. Think Declaration of Independence, c

What happens when people fill pews but drift on first principles? We sit down with researcher George Barna to unpack a new survey of frequent churchgoers that reveals only 11 percent hold a biblical worldview, a third prefer socialism to capitalism, and support for Israel rarely moves beyond prayer. It’s sobering, but it’s also a roadmap. If we can see clearly where formation has failed, we can rebuild how we teach, mentor, and live the faith in public.We dig into why worldview isn’t an academic word—it’s the lens behind every decision you make. From voting and stewardship to generosity and courage, belief drives behavior. We explore how moral relativism sneaks in when churches avoid hard topics, and how kindness without conviction becomes a substitute for obedience. On economics, we separate personal charity from state control and connect Jesus’ teaching on stewardship, diligence, and envy to today’s policy debates. On Israel, we outline a layered approach: pray, learn the history, understand the covenant th

Forty million people live in slavery today, yet many pulpits are quiet where they were once loudest. We revisit a forgotten tradition of courageous preaching that confronted unjust laws, trained citizens to think biblically about public life, and helped turn spiritual conviction into cultural reform. From biblical prohibitions against “man stealing” to the explosive pushback against the 1850 Fugitive Slave Law, we explore why past pastors urged civil disobedience when policy defied conscience—and why that courage matters now.We walk through the practical legacy of the Pilgrims—elective government, purchased property instead of seizure, early education statutes, and due process reforms that shortened witch trials—showing how Scripture can shape fair, durable policy. Then we widen the lens to Genesis’s three institutions: family, civil government, and congregational worship. If laws shape culture more than programs do, a private faith that never engages public life leaves families, schools, and communities expo

If spiritual fireworks don’t change the neighborhood by Monday, what are we missing? We take a hard look at a century of American revivals that stirred the heart but barely nudged the culture, and then we trace a different path: how revivals become awakenings when believers are discipled and Scripture is applied to daily life. Not just belief, but apprenticeship. Not just emotion, but formation that shapes families, work, and public decisions.We dig into the Great Commission’s overlooked command to “teach them to observe all things” and connect it to concrete civic questions. What does Jesus’ teaching on stewardship say about rewarding productivity? How does the vineyard wage story illuminate voluntary contracts? Why does “Where are your accusers?” echo through America’s due process rights to confront accusers and compel witnesses? Along the way, we surface sobering data on the behavior gap between professing Christians and the wider culture, making the case that conversion without discipleship leaves public

A billion people watched a memorial defined by bold forgiveness, and something shifted. Church attendance spiked, Bible sales soared, and campus arenas from Ohio State to Florida State filled with students lining up for baptism. We take that momentum seriously and ask the harder question history demands: when hearts change, do cultures follow?We walk through the evidence: record Easter services, mass beach baptisms, and stadium crusades drawing thousands. Then we hold it against the long arc of American revivals. The First and Second Great Awakenings shaped ideals of liberty and fueled abolition, yet later waves overlapped with the Progressive Era, when eugenics spread through state laws and media reframed faith as anti-science. The Scopes trial’s legal reality lost to a narrative that still echoes. Meanwhile, the Frankfurt School’s critical theory crossed the Atlantic, took root in elite universities, and helped redirect the formation of generations.Our aim is clarity and responsibility. Renewal is real when

Change doesn’t arrive with a hashtag; it arrives with a name on a ballot, a calm voice at a microphone, and a chair at the school board table. We sit down with Joe Messina—who spent twenty-four years in the trenches of a California district—to unpack how a lone dissenting vote became a durable majority that actually moves policy. From pulling back the curtain on graphic curriculum to establishing clear flag policies and defending parental notification, Joe shows how local courage scales when it’s anchored in law, civics, and community.You’ll hear how a trades education fight led him into public service, why he lost twice before winning, and what changed once he was inside the room. We dig into the practical: reading questionable passages aloud to force transparency, leaning on legal allies to set guardrails, and equipping students to assert their rights without picking unnecessary fights. Joe’s approach is simple and repeatable—fill the room with thoughtful supporters, speak to policy not people, and keep goi

Stadium altar calls, campus baptisms, and a surge in Bible sales are stealing headlines for all the right reasons—but the real story is what comes next. We dive into the data pointing to a national spiritual renewal and challenge ourselves to aim higher than momentary inspiration, asking how to turn revival into a durable great awakening through deliberate discipleship and principled policy.We share the energy and outcomes from the Pro Family Legislators Conference, where more than 400 lawmakers and spouses compared notes, traded model bills, and left with a playbook of 150+ policy ideas. From privacy and parental rights to education reform, we walk through how one “what if” can spread across dozens of states and become law. Along the way, we revisit history’s best teachers—George Whitefield and Charles Finney—who coupled evangelism with action, showing how spiritual conviction can guide civic courage.The conversation shifts to the long game: why faithfulness outruns quick wins, how school board persistence i

Headlines have trained us to expect the worst. Today we chase what’s actually moving the needle: international pressure for religious freedom, a youth movement catching fire on campuses, a surprising recalibration in the climate debate, and a clear turn in border enforcement that’s reshaping incentives on the ground.We start with Nigeria’s designation as a Country of Particular Concern by the U.S. Commission on International Religious Freedom, led by former Congresswoman Vicki Hartzler. That CPC label isn’t symbolic—it can trigger cuts to foreign aid and other diplomatic levers when persecution spikes, and the data from recent years has been devastating. Naming the problem is step one; signaling consequences is step two. We unpack why this matters for believers, minority faiths, and anyone who thinks human rights should mean something beyond resolutions.From global policy to local momentum, we head to Texas where Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick pledged one million dollars to launch Turning Point USA chapters on high sch

When should America step in abroad—and when should we hold the line? We open with Nigeria and the persecution of Christians, unpacking the hard tradeoffs between humanitarian outrage and constitutional guardrails. We weigh the tools that can move regimes without war—credible threats, sanctions, aid leverage, quiet diplomacy—and the times when defending American lives, ships, and commerce must take priority. Using the Barbary pirates and the French Quasi-War as guides, we lay out a practical test for “American interest” that avoids isolationism without drifting into endless entanglements.From there, we zoom out to the role of government itself. Individuals and churches are called to forgive; civil authority is tasked with justice. That distinction matters for foreign policy and domestic order alike. We connect it to the Constitution’s enumerated powers and the Founders’ warnings about entangling alliances, showing how a clear mission for government keeps compassion meaningful and justice consistent.We also tac

A world war ended with silence at the eleventh hour. From that moment, the United States began a long journey from Armistice Day to Veterans Day—a shift from marking a ceasefire to honoring every American who wore the uniform. We explore how that change happened, why it matters, and what it asks of us today as citizens navigating policy, budgets, and public life.We open with the history: proclamations from Woodrow Wilson and Calvin Coolidge, Congress formalizing Armistice Day, and Dwight Eisenhower leading the move to Veterans Day after WWII. Then we turn to the Marine Corps, celebrating 250 years since Congress formed two battalions in 1775—before a formal Navy existed. That origin set the tone for the Pacific theater, where Marines carried island after island under brutal conditions. Through Iwo Jima and Guadalcanal, we unpack the leadership and tactics that shaped strategy and, ultimately, the war’s end.The heart of the episode is story. Herschel “Woody” Williams, a flamethrower at Iwo Jima, survived stagg

Headlines say the shutdown is over; the real story is where the fight moves next. We open with how the Senate finally broke the stalemate—motion to proceed, cloture math, and why debate time became a bargaining chip—and then trace the ripple effects into your wallet, your health care, and the federal workforce. Eight Democrats crossed the aisle to end the longest funding lapse on record, and that crossover set up a December carveout to debate the Affordable Care Act on its own.We walk through what actually got funded and why: Agriculture to keep SNAP steady, Military and Veterans to protect benefits, and the Legislative Branch to keep Congress paid. The remaining nine appropriations bills head to the House, where nothing is guaranteed. From there, the focus tightens on health care: rising exchange premiums, subsidies that primarily flow to insurers, and studies showing coverage can lower stress while system costs keep climbing. We challenge the incentives behind today’s subsidy design and explore reforms that

A generation raised on shifting standards is reaching for something solid. We sit down with Father Frank Pavone to explore why younger Catholic priests are embracing clear, biblical convictions on life and identity—and how that clarity is drawing Gen Z, especially young men, back into the Church. This isn’t a political pivot; it’s a move toward coherence in a time of confusion, where objective moral truth replaces the fog of moral relativism.We trace the cultural and spiritual forces shaping this trend: pandemic-era disruption, public ambiguity from high-profile politicians, and decades of muddled teaching on life ethics. Father Frank shares insights from a new national survey showing younger priests leaning more conservative, especially on abortion and sexual morality. We connect those convictions to America’s founding ideals, revisiting the right to life as a core principle affirmed by early jurists like James Wilson and rooted in the nation’s moral imagination.The conversation also highlights what’s drawin

Headlines hint at chaos, but the signals underneath tell a different story. We connect three surprising trends that point to a quiet realignment: a 6-3 Supreme Court decision that reaffirms biological sex on passports as a verifiable, security-critical fact; polling that shows a growing share of Americans view Democrats as too liberal while Republicans are seen as slightly less conservative; and new Barna research revealing men—especially Gen Z—are returning to church in significant numbers.We unpack what the Court’s ruling really means for identity, equal protection, and border security, and why the comparison to country of birth matters. Then we dig into the polling: how positions on late-term abortion and gender policy alienate moderates, why sentiment hasn’t always translated into votes, and what courage and clarity would look like for candidates who want to serve the broad middle without abandoning core convictions.The most hopeful signal comes from the pews. After years where women outnumbered men in ch

Ever wonder how 60 votes can stop 51 from passing a bill? We pull back the curtain on the modern filibuster to show how Senate procedure—not the Constitution—decides whether a majority can actually govern. We trace the shift from the old, talk‑until‑you‑drop tactic to today’s cloture threshold and explain when a simple majority can change the rules, when it can’t, and how the nuclear option carved out exceptions for nominations and budget matters. It’s a candid look at principle versus prudence: even if restoring majority rule aligns with the Founders’ intent, what happens when moral consensus is thin and stakes are high?We also dive into presidential term limits with clear answers. George Washington set the two‑term standard; FDR broke it during World War II; the 22nd Amendment settled it. We address persistent myths about loopholes—whether a former two‑term president can return via the vice presidency or another path—and explain why those theories falter against constitutional text and eligibility requireme

The headlines from Virginia and New Jersey aren’t the whole story. What’s happening inside America’s churches is shaping the way people think, vote, and live far more than a single election night. We sit down with David Closson of Family Research Council to unpack new nationwide research on regular churchgoers—folks in the pews weekly—and the picture is both sobering and hopeful.On the hopeful side, the data show an unmistakable hunger for worldview training. Large majorities want clear, Bible-based teaching on religious freedom, social and political responsibility, human sexuality, and the value of life. Gen Z and millennials are showing up more, streaming worship music, and downloading spiritual apps at record rates. People are searching for truth and meaning, and they’re walking through church doors to find it.The sobering side: core doctrine is slipping. Only 61% of frequent attenders affirm an orthodox view of God, and a growing share substitute new-age “higher consciousness” language for biblical truth.

A simple promise—“digital makes life easier”—can mask a complicated reality. We dive into the fast-unfolding world of digital ID and how it’s being stitched together with payments, health credentials, and online access under the banner of “digital public infrastructure.” With Alex Newman, we examine concrete examples from Canada’s account freezes to China’s social credit system and Europe’s emerging digital wallet to understand what happens when identity, money, and movement live behind the same gatekeepers.We unpack the policy pretexts—child safety, fraud prevention, immigration control—and show how noble goals can harden into tools of control once systems interlock. Alex explains why central bank digital currencies are often designed to tie back to ID and personal data, and how that linkage can turn “verification” into a lever over daily life: work, travel, banking, and speech. We revisit constitutional guardrails like the Fourth Amendment and discuss why rights can erode by default when access requires con

A lot of voices are loud right now. Few are clear. We invited Frank Turek to help us cut through the noise with a steady, evidence-based approach to faith that can stand up in a college auditorium or a family living room. Frank shares how mentoring sharpened Charlie’s gospel focus, why campus conversations are shifting from gotcha questions to genuine interest, and how a tragic moment sparked a surprising surge in Bible reading and church attendance.We unpack the backbone of Frank’s method: four questions that form a simple, powerful framework for apologetics—Does truth exist? Does God exist? Are miracles possible? Did Jesus rise from the dead?—and how to use that framework to answer tough objections with patience and precision. Frank also opens up about his own path into apologetics, the influence of Norman Geisler, and the birth of CrossExamined, the app and platform that puts quick facts and longer form resources at your fingertips.The conversation turns to public life and personal calling. Politics isn’t

Headlines can make it feel like everything’s slipping, but look closer and you’ll spot the quiet course corrections reshaping daily life. We walk through a set of concrete wins—each from a different corner of culture—that point to a broader turn toward sanity, safety, and conscience. In Texas, a unanimous ruling clarifies that judges are not forced to violate religious convictions, a small-town question that now sets a statewide standard. In Silicon Valley, smart shareholder engagement nudges Apple to expand Communication Safety to all minors and hide adult-only apps from teen accounts, proving that stewardship beats outrage when you want lasting change.We also dig into the stakes of state elections, where rhetoric meets consequence. A Virginia race flips twelve points after an extreme message surfaces, reminding us that voters still draw lines—and that constitutional questions on life, parental consent, and marriage won’t be decided by apathy. Beyond politics, we unpack a surprising trend in the Catholic Chu

A tough listener question pushed us to the heart of a growing divide: should Christians support Israel when many Jews don’t confess Christ and when Israel’s government, like any government, can act wrongly? We roll up our sleeves and trace the argument from bedrock Scripture to real-world policy, aiming for clarity without clichés.We start where the Bible starts: God’s covenant with Abraham in Genesis 12 and the striking moment in Numbers 22–23 when Balaam cannot curse what God has blessed. From there, we turn to Romans 11, where Paul rejects the idea that God cast off Israel. He calls the church a wild branch grafted into a Jewish root and warns us not to grow proud. Galatians 3 affirms that those in Christ are Abraham’s heirs, yet it never uproots Israel from the story; the picture is a family where we pray for an estranged sibling to come home, not a courtroom where we celebrate a disinheritance.Then we look at the map. Israel remains America’s most capable ally in the Middle East, a flawed but vital democ

Want a front-row seat to how states can shape the future of freedom? We bring lawmakers and policy pros together for a candid, strategy-rich look at AI guardrails, parental rights, energy security, civics reform, and the life debate—then pair it with spiritual renewal that keeps leaders grounded and brave. This is where model bills, clear frameworks, and practical tactics are forged, tested, and shared across red and blue states alike.We dig into the AI choices before us: wait for distant bureaucrats to dictate the rules, or lead with American values like privacy, consent, and transparency. From biometric data protections and algorithm accountability to the grid demands of AI growth and the rising push for digital IDs abroad, we map out concrete tools statehouses can use right now. We also explore the civics reset students need—moving beyond trivia to constitutional thinking—and the pro-life framework that anchors complex questions to first principles without losing compassion or legal precision.Parental righ